Exchange rates represent the linkage between one country and its partners in the global economy. They affect the relative price of goods being traded (exports and imports), the valuation of assets, and the yield on those assets. In the period of fixed or constant exchange rates these prices, values, and yields were predictable over time. However, since 1973 we have been living in a world of flexible rates where foreign exchange markets determine these rates based on trade flows, interest rate differentials, differing rates of inflation, and speculation about future events.
Exchange rates can be expressed as the foreign price of a domestic currency (i.e., the Euro price of a U.S. dollar) or its reciprocal -- the domestic price of foreign currency. We will express these values using the following notation:
the Euro price of a Dollar: €P/$or
the Dollar price of a Euro: $P/€Currently this particular ratio of currencies is near parity (1:1) and thus numerically not very interesting. The following represents the foreign-exchange value of a U.S. dollar as of October 2002 (from here on out, exchange rates will be expressed as the Foreign Price of a Dollar 'FP/$'):
All of the above rates represent Nominal Exchange Rates in that they are the actual posted trading rates on foreign exchange markets. These particular rates can be used to find the domestic price of foreign goods. For example, suppose that we are interested in the price of of a portable CD player manufactured in Japan:
PJapan = ¥ 8060if the exchange rate is:
¥124 = $1then the domestic (U.S.) price of this same good is:
PU.S. = $65 (8060/124)As exchange rates fluctuate, the domestic prices of foreign goods will often be affected:
The weaker yen (it now takes more yen to buy a U.S. dollar) or stronger dollar (a dollar now buys more yen), has led to a reduction in the price of Japanese exports and U.S. imports. We would expect that this change will lead to an increase in the flow of goods from Japan to the U.S. However, trade flows are affected not by nominal exchange rates, but instead, Real Exchange RatesPurchasing Power Parity
In order to understand the determination of real exchange rates, we need to examine the concept of Purchasing Power Parity or PPP.
Suppose that we compare the price of a common good in two different countries.
The Economist magazine often used a McDonald's Big Mac for
this purpose. McDonald's operates in many countries around the world selling
products governed by strict specifications and standards. The presentation
and taste of a Big Mac (based on this author's experience) is identical
in Beijing, Denver, Jakarta, Singapore, and Seoul. Using this homogeneous
worldwide product, we expect the following to be true:
¥P(Big Mac) / $P(Big Mac) = ¥279 / $2.25 = ¥124 : $1But what if we had the following:
¥P(Big Mac) / $P(Big Mac) > nominal exchange rate.We could therefore take $1000 and buy 444 Big Macs; export the Big Macs to Japan and sell them for ¥300 each. This would generate ¥ 133,200 in revenue. We then sell yen on foreign exchange markets and buy dollars. At the current exchange rate, this would allow us to buy $1074 (¥133,200/¥124) and earn a profit of $74.
However, this process of arbitrage (on a larger scale) should affect
Big Mac prices and the nominal exchange rate. The buying
of Big Macs in the U.S. should push the domestic price upwards.
The selling of Big Macs should drive prices down in Japan.
The selling of Yen on foreign exchange markets should weaken the
Yen and the buying of Dollars should strengthen the dollar. This
activity will continue until the ratio of Big Mac prices is just
equal to the nominal exchange rate.
εr = e.r.nominal[Pdomestic / Pforeign]or
εr = (¥P/$)[$P(Big Mac) / ¥P(Big Mac)]This real exchange rate 'εr' is a unit-free measure where, in the case of a single good, its value can be interpreted relative to 1.0 (PPP). In our above example where '¥P/$ = 124:1, the ¥P(Big Mac) = 300, and the $P(Big Mac) = 2.25 we would calculate the real rate to be:
εr = (124)[2.25 / 300] = 0.93or 1 Big Mac in the U.S. is equivalent to 0.93 Big Macs in Japan allowing for arbitrage opportunities. Either the Yen must weaken, the price of Big Macs in the U.S. must increase, or the price of Big Macs in Japan must fall. However, other economic events or conditions (capital flows, trade barriers, price-making power) may prevent this from happening. These real exchange rates do provide a foundation for the direction of trade flows such that:
Net Exports 'NX' = f(-)(εr)The above rate of 0.93 would lead to the export of Big Macs from the U.S. and imported into Japan.
The calculation of real exchange rates are more-likely based on a basket of goods rather that a single homogeneous commodity. Thus price indices in different countries are used such that:
εr = e.r.nominal[CPIdomestic / CPIforeign]In constructing the real exchange rate this way we can then think about how differences in rates of inflation among nations either affect this real rate and thus trade flows or perhaps leads to changes in nominal exchange rates:
if %ΔPU.S. > %ΔPJapan then either: εr or e.r.nominalIn using these indices, we can no longer interpret the real exchange rate relative to a unit value (1.0). Instead we are forced to look at the direction of change in the real rate to understand the effect on exports and imports.
Concepts for Review: